Last post I reviewed a campaign where for every Facebook fan the brand gave out some donation to an NGO. A mix of CSR and marketing for the company. This campaign I found to be a bit lacking. Just a few days ago I came across a similar campaign by a fitness brand, Equinox. They are donating $1 for every Facebook fan.

I actually liked what they are doing on their social media. There are certain reasons why I find the Equinox campaign thought provoking and interesting..

1. Equinox has a lot going on in their social media. So their marketing is not solely dependant on the donations given to NGO.

2. Equinox is already a very popular brand on social media. Their endorsing this NGO not only brings the NGO money but also publicity which is very important for any non-profit.

3. They are donating to Cycle for Limbs which is connected to Fitness. So there is a brand sync. This is important because it allows the community to rally around it in a way that is harmonious to the brands content strategy.

Most Importantly,

4. They are donating $1 for every fan. If they put Facebook ads they would be spending less than $1 for every fan. So they are actually donating more to the NGO than they would if they did the usual marketing!

That is why I feel at the end of the day the NGO really gains from this association and it adds a good touch to the whole Equinox social media campaign. It is a cool idea where part of the marketing budgets of corporates flows into non-profits.

 

I am very sensitive about what/how much people are contributing to causes and NGOs. Since college I have been volunteering with non-profits. I never really donated any money though because I hardly earned any. Once I did start earning a decent amount I have been planning where and what to donate to. I have ideas on it, and I will elaborate more on that later and probably on my other personal blog as its not social media related :)

What I don’t plan to do is to follow facebook pages which say they will donate Rs 1/- for every fan they get. I know this trend started out a long time back with Drew’s Cancer tweets being one of first and then many others also followed the trend.

Donate to causes sure – but if you are promoting your services by saying “oh you should use our services because we donate to an NGO” thats just lame. More than lame its playing with peoples guilt and good sentiment – and you are just generating business out of it.

The Ask Me campaign just seems in bad taste,

Lack of a Genuine Premise

One of the first such social media campaigns – the Drews Cancer campaign – there was a genuine premise there. I remember a similar campaign by Anaggh for Goonj and it was genuine and I also tweeted etc.. there. Moreover these were started by individuals as a small effort and then it snowballs.

Making Profit

Ads on Facebook to increase their fans would cost Ask Me atleast 5 INR. Here they are getting fans at such a cheaper rate. So the least they can do is donate all that they saved by not putting ads into the NGO – that would make it better. For a company like AskMe I find a donation of Rs 1 too small. After this campaign which they hope will go viral if they do get say for example 10,000 fans then they just pay 10,000 INR to the NGO. Isn’t that a wee bit small amount for a company to be donating?? And in return aren’t the increase in 10,000 fans a much bigger thing that the company is getting in return?

 

 

Have compiled a series of analytical articles of kid brands using social media to engage with their target audience. Its very interesting to see how they have activities that are directed at the younger audience even though officially kids cannot have a Facebook profile until they are 13 years of age.

You can read the case-studies here!

It covers brands like McDonalds, Lego, Toys R Us amongst others. All of them have a different take on their target audience, look and feel, activities, sales generation. It was good fun and insightful taking a closer look at these campaigns!

Despite what the T&C says, kids are hugely active on social networks. Most of us know a lot of kids who are friends with us on Facebook, Twitter and now Google Plus too. Yet, its sort of a dilemma for a marketeer to target them via these social networks because technically by the rule book, they are not supposed to be there :p

Curious about actual numbers related to the kids demographic I compiled a presentation of my finds. Its quite interesting.

What would you say to kids using social media, considering the stream of frequent adult content that is shared there?

 

Number of times the first things potential clients ask me is “Will it improve Google Ranking”.. I don’t want to say yes because I don’t want to sell social media as a search engine optimizer tool! Its a whole lot more. Building communities, interacting with them, generating feedback and a whole lot more…

After all these more prominent benefits of social media are covered, it does infact improve Google search results! If you have a social network brand presence you will see that it displays very high on the search engine results! Blogs, popular updates on these networks also soar very quickly to some of the top search engine results! We have not even gotten into ‘Social Search’! So this is just one of the reasons to have a robust social media presence for your brand!

Companies often get scared of negetive feedback they would face on social media, the thing is that the reason I thought of writing this post is exactly due to negetive feedback – My somewhat negetive feedback blog post for Priyadarshini Cab services. I was planning on calling their car yesterday for some traveling within the city and in order to get their number I did an online search as would a large number of people. I scrolled down to find their official website – it turns out none was listed! They only have profiles on quikr, justdial and such but no official presence. I was surprised to find my blog on my bad experience with their cars was showing up on the first Google page! Not just that, I had another bad experience yesterday with their car and I can add that blog as ‘Part 2′ ;p

I am sure if they had a website and social media profiles it would have taken up the first 3-4 links and then the profiles on justdial and such. So atleast blog posts like mine wouldn’t appear on Google first page. So if clients avoid social media due to -ve feedback, it will just come back and bite their ass.

 

So just yesterday I saw Dharmesh’s tweet about an article on startups and vampires. Its a good read, and true actually about life itself.  Very often I find that after few years of friendship both people change, and soon it becomes a dead-weight as the other person keeps pulling you down because they are a different person! So while Andy might call them vampire-friends, lets get back to what I wanted to say about startups! :p

I have been writing quite a bit about how troublesome recruitment has been in DigiWhirl. So sometime back we, the DigiWhirl team figured it was just not working, I cannot possibly keep watching over every little work that my employees did and so we scaled down and became very selective with everything. Selective with clients and with hires (if at all). So we are now a small & cool team happy with what we are doing.

We keep getting mails applying for any vacancies and such. So recently we started something new that I find interesting, we basically take just one or two trainees at a time and get them to work on an in-house DigiWhirl campaign. For a two month intership we give them work credit and a reference letter which they can use in their CVs or for next work assignments. If we really like working with each other then we can always work on other commercial projects as and when it works out! :)

I know some might be thinking its ‘chindhi’ as in miserly to not pay but the fact is that very few freshees provide a work quality that is acceptable for a commercial client project. Paying them and re-doing most of their work is not something I am ok with.

I think this is a good approach for hiring fresh talent but I am still wondering about how to work with experienced professionals before actually ‘hiring’ them. The whole hire, work, fire (if it doesnot work out) is just a tedious process, and it leads to a waste of time. Also when we hire an experienced person it means we have a project that needs his skills and when they don’t deliver its just a stress on the company to do the clients project well!

O.0 This is what I like best about running a company – figuring stuff out!

 

Social media is a really happening field. Almost every marketing person has it on their agenda, so when they meet me they always want to know more. If the meeting is a business one then they want to know how to catapault their brand into fame and glory in the social arena! Everytime I just try to spruce their ideas and guide the topic towards building a more structured setup from where they can start of with some sustained activities which can then become the platform for more dynamic stuff.

One of the common thoughts I have come across is that they don’t want the usual run of the mill stuff – they want their social media to be true to their brand, they want something different, a class apart from the rest, yadi yadi yada…. and typically with these brands, I find that for months their enthusiastically created Facebook Pages are just langhuishing around. No new content, barely any fan activity. Even typical is some month old odd update from the brand thats either too ‘brand technical’ and not appealing to general fans.

For any of this to really get off the table there are somethings that I feel are crucial behind-the-scenes before something exciting actually happens for the brand on social media,

A for strAtegy

Structure & Sustainability
Like I have said so many times before, a sound strategy is necessary to start out with. It would also ensure that the activities are aligned to the larger brand image being put out and not ad hoc. It would ensure that they can be sustained over months, allowing fans to warm up to it and spike interactions. This would include an executive structure for the activity – who is going to do the work? Where is the top administration going to get involved? Very often pages langhuish cause they are looking for the right person or agency to execute their strategy.

Depending on the industry, the top management might need to have some solid presence like a Twitter channel or a Blog. They then need to be commited from the start rather than later not doing their bit and the whole strategy crumbling. I have written a more in-depth article on strategy here.

b for bUDGET

Show me the Money!
Probably one of the main reasons why campaigns are cut off mid way or they never take off at all would be that while the company can talk a lot about what it wants, the money they are willing to put in is quite little! They are more used to one-time traditional campaigns where the money is splurged and marketing is done. Social media needs a longterm outlook, so paying a good amount monthly is something they are too frisky about. Shelling out bucks for a two-three month campaign is what they typically end up doing and as a result once the campaign is over they come back to square zero with no basic presence on social media. The reason they come back to square 0 is also because they hire some goofers who start a brand page called ‘brandso-socampaign’ – this campaign can’t be run again and as a result the page is a dud after the campaign. If they had started a normal brand page then atleast they would have this page with high number of fans for next time. :D

C for the honCho!

Top management involvement
This is another big hurdle. Traditional campaigns just need to be approved and then its off their table, but social media can have new developments daily! The top management would like to get involved but they don’t have the time, but they still want everything to be in their control and so the campaign remains fettered in a big way. The brand hardly interacts with fans because the right people don’t shell out the time. This is ofcourse not a simple matter because wrong responses from the executive person can really back fire! There are number of reasons for this – sometimes the top guy is technologically dumb! or he gets even less about social media than his marketing team! :D
Again the solution I feel would lie in the initial strategy and structure – here the right mix of executive team and top folks needs to be made to ensure that the brands activities have the right man power behind them to grow! In the strategy the brand image and content strategy need to be drilled in so as to reduce risks of the wrong message going out. This risk can never really be eleminated as has been seen in examples from top marketing company goof ups like the Chrysler incident where the executive sent out a swear word into a tweet! Along with this some 101 on how to manage a social media crisis would be good too!

A lot of Indian companies seem to hire a college intern to manage their Facebook page, is just not done! I recently came across someone who used to supervise the content going up on a corporate brand page but she herself doesn’t have any technical knowledge about page working – she is now interning with another media agency! What really works is when brands start having a senior digital marketeer position in their management. It will also be great for us companies to talk to these guys, cause they know the field better.

So while the social media industry is interesting there is a just a lot random stuff being done. Just the other day met a person who was very excited about a website idea he had, which was plain old web 1.0! In the age of Twitter & blogs he was talking about websites. Its tough to understand when there is so much info available online, so many international brand case-studies keep coming up, why do so many Indian companies look lost? And then from somewhere we come across an NGO like Pratham having put out an exciting social media usage case-study!

 

Games are one of my favourite ways to pass time. I think they invigorate our passion and enthusiasm! They also develop various skills in us. In line with this I always get excited when I see some Indian game online – out there for all to get acquainted with our culture.

Imagine my surprise when while browsing through board games on the iTunes store I see something called ‘Shakuni’! Initially I thought it would be some random game… But on researching more the game is – Chausar!! The very game where Shakuni fools Yudhisthir in Mahabharata to leave his kingdom and go into the wild…

Excitedly I downloaded the app which is less than 20 mb hence it can be downloaded via 3G. It has been made by Hibiscus Tech (http://hibiscustech.com/index.html). It’s a pretty good game, with a Single player v/s AI option as well as multiplayer options. It was very cool for me to play this mythology game that means something to almost every kid in India who grew up to mahabharata stories! It would be cool to have a better intro to the game where it explains what Mahabharata is and what role Chausar played in it. The rules could also be better explained.

I am planning to make an offline version of this game too, to play with all my younger cousins and older folk. It’s very much like Ludo but with some interesting differences! There are two rectangular dice and can be played with 3 or 6 token options. The tokens can come out of the house only on a throw of ’1′.

Check out the game on iTunes: http://t.co/gWBPDW45

This is an interesting way for companies to increase their marketing presence by giving out free apps. It also gives them an opportunity to showcase their work to their clients. Surprisingly though the company has hardly mentioned this game on their website, curious! Well I got an interesting game to play… :)